← Markets

Who will Trump publicly insult by September 30?

Trump Vol. $110,651 50 traders

Nicolás Maduro99%
Barack Obama100%
Abdul El-Sayed100%
Kaitlan Collins100%
$110,651 Vol. Trump

Outcomes

40
Chance
Tucker Carlson
74% ▲ 3
Megyn Kelly
45% ▼ 5
Candace Owens
20% ▼ 8
Alex Jones
50% ▲ 22
Pope Leo XIV
6%
Vladimir Putin
5% ▲ 1
Joe Biden Resolved
100%
Barack Obama Resolved
100% ▲ 6
Marjorie Taylor Greene
46% ▼ 13
Pam Bondi
9% ▲ 4
Benjamin Netanyahu
14% ▲ 9
J.D. Vance
16% ▼ 4
Melania Trump
50%
Xi Jinping
7% ▲ 3
Andy Burnham
45% ▲ 26
Elon Musk
44% ▼ 1
Jerome Powell
43% ▼ 11
Nicolás Maduro Resolved
100%
Zohran Mamdani
31% ▼ 9
Jimmy Kimmel
59% ▼ 3
Emmanuel Macron
23% ▼ 6
Friedrich Merz
28% ▼ 2
Norah O'Donnell
53% ▲ 2
Kaitlan Collins Resolved
100% ▲ 39
Mohammed bin Salman
5% ▼ 1
Kevin Warsh
17% ▼ 9
Karoline Leavitt
3%
James Talarico Resolved
100%
Stephen Colbert
28% ▲ 1
Abdul El-Sayed Resolved
100% ▲ 14
Kathy Hochul
77% ▲ 6
Ilhan Omar
60% ▼ 2
Letitia James
52% ▲ 2
J.B. Pritzker Resolved
100% ▲ 1
Jon Ossoff
59% ▼ 1
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
63% ▲ 8
Mark Carney
86% ▼ 6
Hillary Clinton
59% ▲ 1
Elizabeth Warren
50% ▼ 13
Adam Schiff
53% ▼ 2

Recent trades

  • No recent trades

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Donald Trump makes any public statement in which he insults the listed individual between market creation and the specified date (ET). Otherwise, this market will resolve to "No". A public statement is any written, verbal, or recorded statement which is either made in a public setting, published by the speaker, or on the record to media, and the direct language of which is made publicly available within the specified timeframe. Pre-recorded public statements will count for the date (ET) that they are made publicly available. Statements made in private that are subsequently leaked will not qualify, even if credibly reported. Narrations and paraphrasings do not qualify. Images and videos posted on verified social media accounts will only qualify if they contain insulting language clearly directed at the individual, whether within the content itself or in an accompanying caption. Language within the content of a video will only qualify if Donald Trump is clearly portrayed as saying it. Insulting language within the content of a video said by anyone other than Donald Trump or a portrayal thereof will not qualify. A quote post will qualify if added language independently qualifies as an insult, or endorses insulting language directed at the individual within the quoted post; a repost of another account's post will not qualify. A public statement qualifies as an insult if it mocks, degrades, or disparages the individual either personally or professionally. This includes calling the individual a clearly insulting trait (e.g., weak, stupid, disloyal, a failure), using an insulting nickname (e.g., Crooked Hillary), using other clearly derogatory language, or using the negative form of a positive trait in a clearly derogatory manner (e.g., “He isn’t smart”, “He has no judgment”). Disparaging the individual in their professional capacity will qualify (e.g., "He is a disaster candidate," "He is terrible at his job"); however, negative comments directed at the individual's specific actions, policies, or decisions will not qualify (e.g., "He has bad policies," "He is wrong about healthcare"). A statement made in direct reference to the individual will qualify even if they are not named, so long as it is reasonably clear from context that they are the subject. The resolution sources will be public statements made by Donald Trump and a consensus of credible reporting.

Comments